An illustration of various satellites shown in space
Premium

Do the oldest satellites in space need saving?

A coalition of scientists and historians are floating a long-shot plan to retrieve orbiting relics—raising questions about what is space junk or space treasure.

Orbital space is full of retro artifacts from the early days of the space race, long defunct and—as one provocative paper suggests—perhaps ripe for retrieval.
GRAPHIC by JASON TREAT, NGM STAFF
ByBrian Kevin
Illustrations byMatt Griffin
September 16, 2025

In one view, Vanguard 1 is a quintessential piece of space junk: an antennaed aluminum ball that Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev dismissively compared to a grapefruit. The United States launched it in March 1958, and the satellite returned radio signals until May 1964. Defunct ever since, it’s the oldest human-made object in orbit.

But to space historian Matt Bille, that grapefruit is “one of the most precious objects” of the early space age, deserving of a place in the Smithsonian. And scientists, he says, could glean much from it about long-term exposure to space. Bille, along with a few like-minded engineers and historians, made this case at a recent conference of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, where Bille is an associate fellow, presenting detailed plans for a hypothetical mission to deorbit Vanguard 1 and bring it home. Though expensive and challenging, they argued, such a mission is feasible—and might appeal to a robotics company or an agency looking to showcase its grappling tech.

(How the space race launched an era of exploration beyond Earth.)

The idea has turned heads, not least for challenging a preference for in situ preservation that’s increasingly enshrined in heritage fields, including the burgeoning discipline of space archaeology. Old satellites “need to be left where they are,” says Alice Gorman, who sits on the International Council on Monuments and Sites’ aerospace committee. They’re safer in orbit, she says, where they belong to no one nation and can be studied via photography and other remote sensing methods.

But space is getting crowded, Bille notes—more than 14,000 satellites orbit the Earth, to say nothing of debris. He and his co-authors frame their technical paper as a thought experiment: Should we ever consider nabbing historically significant satellites? Which might merit consideration? They offer 11 more candidates, each a national first or a pioneering mission, and all conceivably retrievable, Bille says, if one dreams big.

A version of this story appears in the October 2025 issue of National Geographic magazine.